<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Airport Security&#8230;An Invasion of Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.privacypartners.com/2008/06/airport-security-adds-another-invasion-of-privacy-to-the-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.privacypartners.com/2008/06/airport-security-adds-another-invasion-of-privacy-to-the-list/</link>
	<description>Protecting Your Internet Privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:25:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Greif</title>
		<link>http://blog.privacypartners.com/2008/06/airport-security-adds-another-invasion-of-privacy-to-the-list/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Greif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privacypartners.com/archives/123#comment-17</guid>
		<description>While it&#039;s true that I don&#039;t care if I go through this device, there are people who will care.  Some people are very private and/or very shy.  This is somewhat intrusive. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The issue is not that the device is used, it&#039;s that people aren&#039;t informed and don&#039;t know that they have a choice.  Travelers should be able to choose the machine or a pat down.  Then it&#039;s no longer a privacy issue.  If they object to both, then they don&#039;t get to travel.  But at least they are informed of their choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s true that I don&#8217;t care if I go through this device, there are people who will care.  Some people are very private and/or very shy.  This is somewhat intrusive. </p>
<p>The issue is not that the device is used, it&#8217;s that people aren&#8217;t informed and don&#8217;t know that they have a choice.  Travelers should be able to choose the machine or a pat down.  Then it&#8217;s no longer a privacy issue.  If they object to both, then they don&#8217;t get to travel.  But at least they are informed of their choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo</title>
		<link>http://blog.privacypartners.com/2008/06/airport-security-adds-another-invasion-of-privacy-to-the-list/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privacypartners.com/archives/123#comment-16</guid>
		<description>People, get a grip. I seriously doubt that the new X-ray glasses can see your private parts - and if they can who the hell cares. Would you rather be dead or would you rather (possibly) experience a brief moment of embarrassment. There are more important things to think about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People, get a grip. I seriously doubt that the new X-ray glasses can see your private parts &#8211; and if they can who the hell cares. Would you rather be dead or would you rather (possibly) experience a brief moment of embarrassment. There are more important things to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

