<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smile For The Camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.privacypartners.com/2009/07/smile-for-the-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.privacypartners.com/2009/07/smile-for-the-camera/</link>
	<description>Protecting Your Internet Privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:25:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DUSTIN WALLEN</title>
		<link>http://blog.privacypartners.com/2009/07/smile-for-the-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>DUSTIN WALLEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privacypartners.com/?p=395#comment-345</guid>
		<description>Keeping track of every car that comes into the city is ridiculous and taking it way to far. Even though there is only one way into and out of the city, this would still be very expensive and demand a lot of upkeep. As if the city isn’t cash strapped enough as it is. The recession doesn’t allow for this frivolous spending and throwing around of money. The city has good intentions, but I’m sure even the citizens of the town think this is a little much. It is one thing to have to get your picture taken when you speed through a red light, but going into a town for lunch shouldn’t make you have to have surveillance on you the whole way. How long would they keep the pictures too? I’m not sure I believe all of the “only sixty days” stuff, these places always have ways to keep it long after it has been useful to them. If my picture is just sitting around, it is just asking to be hacked and stolen. Not that license plate numbers are necessarily that dangerous, but it is the principle of the matter; I don’t want to be watched going for lunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keeping track of every car that comes into the city is ridiculous and taking it way to far. Even though there is only one way into and out of the city, this would still be very expensive and demand a lot of upkeep. As if the city isn’t cash strapped enough as it is. The recession doesn’t allow for this frivolous spending and throwing around of money. The city has good intentions, but I’m sure even the citizens of the town think this is a little much. It is one thing to have to get your picture taken when you speed through a red light, but going into a town for lunch shouldn’t make you have to have surveillance on you the whole way. How long would they keep the pictures too? I’m not sure I believe all of the “only sixty days” stuff, these places always have ways to keep it long after it has been useful to them. If my picture is just sitting around, it is just asking to be hacked and stolen. Not that license plate numbers are necessarily that dangerous, but it is the principle of the matter; I don’t want to be watched going for lunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

