What’s in Being Anonymous?
A recent newspaper editorial regarding online anonymity has spawned a great deal of comments. The article declared that in these times, people should be limited from being anonymous. The writer argued that there are too many anonymous comments polluting the internet. It was also suggested that newspapers should ban these anonymous comments entirely. This is because these anonymous comments have only added to the bulk of online trash, including false accusations and name-calling attacks.
One critic reacted by saying that this kind of argument is not only inaccurate but also dangerous. He said that online anonymity protects different groups of people. He admitted that anonymity maybe abused by some, especially those who are spreading “vitriolic bile” without limits. However, this is not enough reason to entirely ban online anonymity. As of now, many newspapers have established policies regarding this issue, while others have entirely banned such “privilege”.
The main reason given by those who banned it is for online civility. While this can be true, and as any newspaper should always strive for civility, there is more to being identified online than just the name. Those who favor anonymity say that identification presents a great risk. This risk most often hinders people from speaking their minds for fear of retribution. They also pointed out that history has a lot of stories to tell about anonymous writings that made great contributions to society.

